Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Winnebago Owners Online Community > WINNIEOWNERS COMMUNITY FORUMS > Winnebago General Discussions
Click Here to Login
Register FilesRegistry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-23-2010, 11:47 PM   #1
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Ethanol laced fuel

I would like to know if anyone has tried fuel without ethanol and computed the difference in mileage. We know that the gas that is diluted with ethanol is not as efficient as plain gasoline. Where we are the straight gasoline is about 15 cents more per gallon.
__________________
2007 Itasca Suncruiser 38T
Workhorse W24
2008 Ford Edge toad
agiledog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 04:52 AM   #2
Winnebago Owner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: chokoloskee, fl 34138
Posts: 126
before ethanol I had finally got my M/H up to 7 mpg with cold air induction and K&N filter. Now all I can find is ethanol and I now get 5 to 5.5 mpg.
I run the speed limit I don't poke along.
__________________
2016 Dynamax DX3
USCG Ret BMCM
ron55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 07:27 AM   #3
Winnie-Wise
 
Doug Sage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Originally from near Portland, OR
Posts: 274
Angry

I have found in both my car and my gas motorhome that my mileage drops 17% when I use 10% ethanol. This means that I am actually using MORE gasoline per mile with ethanol.
__________________
Doug Sage
Full timers roaming the good old US of A
2007 Itasca Suncruiser 38J
2015 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk
Doug Sage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 08:24 AM   #4
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Have a flex fuel Ford Explorer w/w mpg gauge since 2005. Using e85 gets about 35% less mileage. Don't notice drop with 10%. If assume linear with e85 10% should result in 4% drop. Probably not noticeable. In many areas 10% is used in winter, suspect winter driving may reduce mpg a little.

N Dienes
nsdienes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 08:54 AM   #5
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
it used to be here in NY ethanol was added to the fuel down state but upstate not. Downstate I would consistently get 19 MPG in my Mazda B4000. When I would travel to the Adirondacks, where fuel was ethanol free, I would get 23 MPG. Without fail, very consistently.

Now, of course, that malignancy is in all of our gasoline here in NY. No escape.
WOODYDEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 12:11 PM   #6
Winnebago Owner
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 91
I copied this from AAA's fuelgaugereport.com. To me, it indicates that a roughly 25% reduction in gas mileage can be expected from using E-85.

". . . according to the Energy Information Administration E-85 delivers approximately 25 percent fewer BTUs by volume than conventional gasoline."
stik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 01:00 PM   #7
Winnebago Watcher
 
Me n Slowpoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
It would sure be nice if at least one station in my area sold ethanol free fuel, currently I would run out of fuel trying to find one. However, I was in an auto parts store recently and while waiting my turn I aisle "shopped". I noticed they were selling injector cleaners for "ethanol" fuel users. So the price of the ethanol free fuel or the ethanol fuel with the cleaners would come out to be about the same price. If it works?
__________________
Me & Slowpoke, USMC [1993 Gulfstream Sunvoyager M8345, F53 Chassis ]

"Travlin with a song and prayer"
Me n Slowpoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 01:32 PM   #8
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
You don't have to believe me but

Quote:
Originally Posted by stik View Post
I copied this from AAA's fuelgaugereport.com. To me, it indicates that a roughly 25% reduction in gas mileage can be expected from using E-85.

". . . according to the Energy Information Administration E-85 delivers approximately 25 percent fewer BTUs by volume than conventional gasoline."

My example up above is only 10% ethanol.!


Go here for the truth because using E-85 is worse than a 25% reduction:

Search for Cars that don't need gas
WOODYDEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 01:54 PM   #9
Winnebago Camper
 
mythplaced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 18
at high altitudes (>5000ft) you need the extra oxygen that the ethanol provides mileage is irrelevant when your engine produces NO POWER!
__________________
Michael (Home base Northern CO)
USED TO HAVE; 03 Alpine 40MDTS Now RVless
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] https://www.tripadvisor.com/MemberPro...AA11052EA9DBB0
mythplaced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 12:33 AM   #10
Winnebago Master
 
MrTransistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 504
Why do we have an EPA

Hi All,

I feel your pain, I have a 1997 Buick Regal, a 1989 GMC Van, and 3 Motorcycles that used to drop in fuel mileage every winter here in Albuquerque. The recorded percentage drops (via spreadsheets for each vehicle) are about equal to what Doug Sage is experiencing.

It is true that the energy content of ethanol is about 25% lower (actually 35.4%) than that of gasoline per gallon, but it is my belief that since ethanol naturally has a higher octane, and since the EPA has mandated it’s use year round for every state, the producers are mixing it with less highly refined gasoline to come up with the same octane as before with regular gasoline which equates to increased profits. Well, maybe not exactly. The unseen costs of adding ethanol to the fuel probably makes it a wash. And just wait till the subsidies on ethanol run out! I hate having to buy premium just to get back to where we were but it’s the only thing my vehicles will run correctly on.

I also believe that Doug is correct that we now use more gasoline than before. This makes the argument moot that the oxygen in the ethanol will reduce the emissions. The single oxygen atom in ethanol may reduce emissions in really old cars that are tuned rich (the original reason for ethanol years ago), but in modern computer controlled, O2 sensor equipped, injected engines, I find it very hard to believe.

As to the claim that the theoretical decrease in economy, for 10% ethanol, should be around 4%. It is actually a theoretical decrease of 3.44%, but the reason the economy drops so much is that the oxygen in the fuel fakes out the O2 sensors and the computer tries to compensate by enriching the mixture at all speeds. This alone negates the reduced emission claims. The only way this can be properly compensated for is like they do on new flex fuel cars, ‘sense’ the percentage of ethanol in the fuel, and correct for it.

Even then, the mileage on E85 is reduced from the theoretical of 34.4% to the 35% or greater drop reported by N Dienes for the reason listed above in paragraph 2. Given the octane difference, you could probably mix corn flakes with the ethanol and still get 100 octane!

All info that follows is dependent on where you look and what numbers you use, but is relatively realistic.

______________Net BTU/gal (U.S.)______% decrease_____Octane
Reg. Gasoline______115,400_____________________________ 87
Ethanol____________75,700______________35.4%______ ___122

________________HHV BTU/lb__________% decrease
Gasoline___________20,400
Ethanol___________12,000_______________41.2%

I’m sure glad we aren’t paying by the pound at the pump! Ops, let the cat out of the bag. I hope the EPA doesn’t read this web site! Uhhh… lets see, now they want to raise the ethanol to 15% or 20%. Good thing I don’t believe in conspiracies! Seems like they want us all to buy ‘new’ flex fuel cars made overseas? Headline: New E85 RV’s get 5 MPG!

Interesting.
Ethanol
__________________
Have Fun!! Mark & Donalda 04 Horizon 40WD no TOW 90,900+ miles and counting
Triumph Bonneville & Susuki S40 on the back
MrTransistor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 04:21 AM   #11
Winnebago Owner
 
94-Newmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 70
I remember when E85 was being promoted as the next big thing. Nothing wrong with M/ethanol as a fuel - many racing classes including Indy/F1 use M/ethanol as a fuel. The benefits are far greater than running regular gasoline. The only problem is that it takes upwards of 1.5x more m/ethanol than gasoline to run the same and the pricing at the pump doesnt reflect that difference - so running m/ethanol is in most cases more expensive than running gasoline.

If the average cost per gallon of gasoline is $2.50/gal then pure m/ethanol pricing needs to be about $1.25-$1.50/gal to equal the same cost/value/MPG as gasoline. Meanwhile they'll continue to blend ethanol with our gasoline to reduce their costs, ruin our fuel mileage and charge us the same price.
__________________
94-Newmar Kountry Star 40-KSDP
Spartan/Cummins 8.3C-300HP/Allison 3060 WTEC-II/25yr RV Tech RVIA Certified/Onan-Cummins Certified
94-Newmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Delivery System DonGee Winnebago General Discussions 9 12-02-2008 03:14 AM
fuel water separator on 330 Cat Big Ben Winnebago General Discussions 6 03-19-2005 02:27 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Winnebago Industries or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.